Unlike games where the referee simply reads the card’s contents, Superfight’s argumentation phase can lead to some creative outcomes, like having to spin the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle to one’s benefit or trying to reach deep into the Marvel canon to argue the outcome of Iron Man wielding Mjolnir. But unlike Cards Against Humanity, where players try to make the best joke out of a bad situation, Superfight inserts a modicum of creativity into the social aspect of the game. The description of the gameplay certainly makes Superfight sound like another variant of Cards Against Humanity. Superfight is Better than Cards Against Humanity
After hearing arguments and rebuttals, the referee decides which of the other players’ fighters has the best chance and that player will win the given round. Once the dust settles, the players will work at convincing the referee that their chosen fighter can defeat the referee’s fighter. Other players will get a chance to help or hurt each other player’s selected fighter by playing additional cards. Each player then decides which combatant to pit against the referee’s fighter.
The play mechanics are simple: a referee unveils a random fighter made up of a character card and a character trait/ability. These social games have all drawn inspiration from Apples to Apples or its adult-themed spawn, Cards Against Humanity. Superfight is a game where Bruce Lee with a Portal gun can go up against a Crazy Cat Lady, where the Giant Marshmallow Man can face off against Genghis Khan with Mario as his sidekick. Battles theoretical, fanciful, and outlandish are all part and parcel of Superfight.
0 kommentar(er)
